Sunday, July 20, 2014

Misc - to sort of catch up...

Some posts from my FB account:

This, to distill the issue, is what we are faced with. If the Senate were not able to change the rules of filibuster - which has very good reasons to exist - then the U.S. would not be where it is today. 

As Heinlein writes in one of his books: 

'I note one proposal to make this Congress a two-house body. Excellent — the more impediments to legislation the better. But, instead of following tradition, I suggest one house of legislators, another whose single duty is to repeal laws. Let the legislators pass laws only with a two-thirds majority... while the repealers are able to cancel any law through a mere one-third minority. Preposterous? Think about it. If a bill is so poor that it cannot command two-thirds of your consents, is it not likely that it would make a poor law? And if a law is disliked by as many as one-third is it not likely that you would be better off without it?

-- Professor Bernardo de la Paz, "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress".'


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"If you believe in equal rights, then what do "women's rights," "gay rights," etc., mean? Either they are redundant or they are violations of the principle of equal rights for all."
Thomas Sowell

No comments:

Post a Comment